Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Paper Reading #24: The Why UI

Comments:
Comment1
Comment2

Reference Information:
Title: The Why UI: Using Goal Networks to Improve User Interfaces
Authors: D. A. Smith, H. Lieberman
Presentation: IUI '10, February 7-10, 2010, Hong Kong, China

Summary: This paper discusses the idea of integrating the user's goals into interfaces in order to provide users with better experience and results when using the interface. In the first part of their development they analyzed data from 43Things.com, a web site that gathers goals from users. The data is analyzed to determine the sub goals that the user might also want to consider in order to accomplish their goal. The second part of their work was to develop an application where users could indicate their goal and they would receive information about what other people did in order to accomplish their goals.


Discussion: The idea of analyzing the users goals in order to aid the user in accomplishing them is really interesting. However, I'm not sure in what kind of settings would this tool be of much help. The paper presents a scenario where the goal is to buy a house, thus the user obtains information about relaters. However, they do not present any data demonstrating the application's efficiency or appeal to users.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Paper Reading #23: Automatic Generation of Research Trails in Web History

Comments:
Adam Friedli
Zack Henkel

Reference Information:
Title: Automatic Generation of Research Trails in Web History
Authors: E.R. Pedersen, K. Gyllstrom, S. Gu, P.J. Hong.
Presentation: IUI'10, February 7-10, 2010, Hong Kong, China

Summary: This conference preceding discusses the development of an interface providing researchers with automatic generated trails of their research. Based on an ethnographic study, they realized the lack of such a system that would provide users with information about the websites they visited, when they visited them and what information they could find in there.

As previous works they describe the History features provided in most web browsers, and the Google History feature. However, these interfaces are not specific to one topic, and do not provide users with more information but URLs. Their system would actually keep track of individual research trail objects, it would analyze the data semantically as wells as the events of each visit.

Their system is currently implemented using a user interface and a model server. Their user interface can be obtained from the New Tab feature that most web browsers have. From there, users can see the most recent research trails. Their model server is currently using Google history data. They assessed their development internally, by using colleagues history data, and as they were developing the system, they were assessing it using this data.

Discussion: This is a great idea! I can't believe there isn't something like this available already. I think it has happened to everyone that while doing web searches we forget what website we were on, and how to get there. Something else I liked was how they describe their motivation, and how they believe this tool can be useful for people performing different types of research, not just continuous research. If someone goes back to work on something they haven't worked on for a while, they can know exactly was was the last things they worked on.

However, I would have loved to see some images of their implementation, and a user study. With a user study they can find out more accurately how appealing this would be to users. We know it would be useful, but would users really use this tool?

Source
The picture above show the current implementation Google provides for its users. Something similar and mentioned in the paper.

Paper Reading #25: Finding Your Way in a Multi-dimensional Semantic Spce with Luminoso

Comments:
Reference Information:
Title: Finding Your Way in a Multi-Dimensional Semantic Space with Luminoso
Authors: R. Speer, C. Havasi, N. Treadway, H. Lieberman
Presentation: IUI'10, February 7-10, 2010, Hong Kong, China

The selected point is a canonical document representing the
expected content of a good review. The gray line connecting the point
to the origin is always shown, as a reference for comparing with other
points.
Summary: Luminoso is a system that allows researchers and users to associate data. Th input data are text files that are dropped in the the folder where the analysis of the data can be found as well. The interface then "grabs"  point, and allows the user to see the related data and analysis. Such actions are also known as data mining, and it has been known that when the user is active in the processes better results can be obtained. To obtain such common sense from the user, the are utilizing an interface called ConceptNet. The way data is analyzed is for example by looking into word repetition and semantic context associations.One of the applications mentioned in the paper is that of creating semantic networks. Because Luminoso provides a visual way for displaying data, it becomes relevant when great amounts of data are to be displayed.

Discussion: Even though I think a really interesting concept they are trying to develop, their explanations about the system and motivations were not very clear described. They also did not present an evaluation to he system, which makes me doubt how useful the system could be. If they would have included some type of user study and discussed it, the reader could obtain a more clear understanding of what things such an application is useful for. The image presented above demonstrates the user display of the interface.

Paper Reading #22: Vocabulary Navigation Made Easier

Comments:

Reference Information:
Title: Vocabulary Navigation Made Easier
Authors: S. Nikolova, X. Ma, M. Tremaine, P. Cook
Presentation: IUI'10, February 7-10, 2010, Hong Kong, China

Related words in ViVA are displayed above the basic
hierarchy, e.g. tea and dessert are associated with food.
Summary: This paper discusses the development of ViVA, a visual interface that makes navigation easier when trying to find words. The challenge they are faced with is implementing such an interface that will help individuals with lexical disorders, such as aphasia. Majority of the past and current work on this area includes interfaces with some kind of hierarchy or category of words, which may lead to disorganization and long search trials.

ViVA is a visual vocabulary interface which allows a more  efficient way of finding words by modeling a "mental lexicon." ViVA will organize vocabulary based on contextual organizations. For example, if you are looking for the word milk, you can find it in the kitchen category. They based their development in an already existing vocabulary hierarchy called Lingraphica, and added the associative features.

They conducted a user study with sixteen individuals. They were provided with a set of missing words, and the users task was to find it. The roup was divided into two, one using a simpler hierarchical language, and the other using ViVA. The results show that there was great improvement in the user's experience with the interface.

Discussion: Reading about technology that aids people with disabilities is always appealing to me. It helps me see that technology is not just about making things simpler or more productive, but it is also there who really need their help. 

I had never heard about this condition before, but from the point of view of an English Second Language speaker I ca n tell that even for us, this kind of interface could work more efficiently than only a translation dictionary. This interface may aid in our thought process, thus learning new words and exercising our language skills. 

Living With Complexity

Living With Complexity
Don A. Norman
Source
Summary:
Chapter 1: In the first chapter of this book, Norman differentiates between complexity and complicated. Something that is complex is described as a state of mind, however something that is understandable, just maybe difficult to master. Something that is complicated is something that is confusing, difficult to understand. Norman claims that complex things can be enjoyable and desirable. When things are too simple, they may appear as boring. 

Chapter 2: Norman discusses the idea that simplicity is in the mind of each individual. Depending on the scenario and the situation the individual is, that is the level of complexity that he will give to a certain task. Norman again discusses Conceptual Models, and how they are created either simple or complex depending on the individual. Norman also demonstrates that not even the things we believe the most simple, are in fact simple. Each artifact should have an appropriate level of complexity. Norman also reaches to the conclusion that individuals prefer an intermediate level of complexity. As previously states, individuals may find simple stuff to be boring and unworthy.

Chapter 3: Norman discusses how things that are supposed to be simple and non trivial can in fact complicate our lives. He gives the examples of door locks and passwords to demonstrate this idea. If we had only one door knob or only one password, then that would be an easy task to remember, however, technology allows for more than one door knob and requires more than one password. This idea then leads us to put information in the world, making it easier to be accessed by undesired people. Norman claims the solution to these problems is in the quality of a design.

Chapter 4: Social signifiers are those indicators that are either deliberately or incidentally placed that provide information to an individual. Signifiers are similar to affordances, in fact they are the perceived affordances. Norman discusses how culture affects these signifiers and how effective they really are.

Discussion: One of the main topics so far in the book is the idea that we should be able to differentiate between something that is complex from something that is confusing. The fact that certain device looks simple, does not necessarily mean it is better, in fact in many of the cases means that the device is even more complicated than it really looks like. 
 
When reading about this, it reminded me about the example Norman gave in one of his previous readings, and how we may think that a phone with less buttons is simpler, however, the telephone does not provide enough information to create an appropriate mental model.
 
Something I did enjoy reading about in these chapters was about the irony technology is what some times introduces complexity, however technology is also able to automate or somehow deal with this high complexity.
 
Even though the ideas are interesting, these were previously introduced by the other Norman books, so it is not something new really. As in the previous readings, Norman examples are useful and applicable to life, which in my opinion makes the book more readable. 

Now that I look back after reading the first chapters of the book, I can now understand the meaning of its cover page. How something that should be really simple, such as salt and pepper containers, can actually complicate our lives if they are not well designed and maybe even standardized.

Book Reading #52: Living With Complexity

Living With Complexity
Don A. Norman

Summary:
Chapter 3: Norman discusses how things that are supposed to be simple and non trivial can in fact complicate our lives. He gives the examples of door locks and passwords to demonstrate this idea. If we had only one door knob or only one password, then that would be an easy task to remember, however, technology allows for more than one door knob and requires more than one password. This idea then leads us to put information in the world, making it easier to be accessed by undesired people. Norman claims the solution to these problems is in the quality of a design.

Chapter 4: Social signifiers are those indicators that are either deliberately or incidentally placed that provide information to an individual. Signifiers are similar to affordances, in fact they are the perceived affordances. Norman discusses how culture affects these signifiers and how effective they really are.

Discussion: Even though the ideas are interesting, these were previously introduced by the other Norman books, so it is not something new really. As in the previous readings, Norman examples are useful and applicable to life, which in my opinion makes the book more readable.

Something I did enjoy reading about in these chapters was about the irony technology is what some times introduces complexity, however technology is also able to automate or somehow deal with this high complexity.

Monday, April 25, 2011

Book Reading #51: Living With Complexity

Living With Complexity
Donald A. Norman

Summary:
Chapter 1: In the first chapter of this book, Norman differentiates between complexity and complicated. Something that is complex is described as a state of mind, however something that is understandable, just maybe difficult to master. Something that is complicated is something that is confusing, difficult to understand. Norman claims that complex things can be enjoyable and desirable. When things are too simple, they may appear as boring. 

Chapter 2: Norman discusses the idea that simplicity is in the mind of each individual. Depending on the scenario and the situation the individual is, that is the level of complexity that he will give to a certain task. Norman again discusses Conceptual Models, and how they are created either simple or complex depending on the individual. Norman also demonstrates that not even the things we believe the most simple, are in fact simple. Each artifact should have an appropriate level of complexity. Norman also reaches to the conclusion that individuals prefer an intermediate level of complexity. As previously states, individuals may find simple stuff to be boring and unworthy.

Discussion: One of the main topics so far in the book is the idea that we should be able to differentiate between something that is complex from something that is confusing. The fact that certain device looks simple, does not necessarily mean it is better, in fact in many of the cases means that the device is even more complicated than it really looks like. When reading about this it reminded my about the example Norman gave in one of his previous readings, and how we may think that a phone with less buttons is simpler, however, the telephone does not provide enough information to create an appropriate mental model.